How Normal Am I? Rethinking AI Beauty Ratings and the Illusion of Objectivity

In an era where algorithms assess everything from creditworthiness to criminal risk, it’s no surprise that AI has entered one of the most personal domains of all—our appearance. Tools like the AI Beauty Analyzer, Beauty Score Test, and AI Beauty Rating promise to quantify attractiveness with surgical precision. But as we lean on technology to answer questions like "how normal am I?" or "how beautiful am I?", it's worth pausing to ask: what does "normal" even mean, and who decides?

The popular project How Normal Am I? by Tijmen Schep invites us to reflect on the hidden systems behind facial analysis. By turning your webcam into a tool for social critique, the site reveals how AI doesn’t just reflect norms—it enforces them. When beauty scores are derived from massive datasets, these systems risk reinforcing racial, gender, and cultural biases under the guise of objectivity.

Today’s AI beauty analyzers don’t just measure symmetry or skin clarity—they’re shaped by the data they consume. If most of that data comes from narrow, Eurocentric definitions of attractiveness, what does that mean for everyone else? More troublingly, what happens when people internalize these scores as truth?

Websites like AI Beauty Test allow users to upload their photos and receive beauty ratings generated by AI. On the surface, this feels like harmless fun. But in reality, it taps into deep psychological questions: Do we want to be seen as normal, or exceptional? Are we seeking affirmation or perfection?

The keyword "hownormalami" hints at a deeper societal desire—not just to be attractive, but to belong. When AI becomes the arbiter of normality, we risk surrendering our individuality to statistical averages. And when tools like beauty score test or ai beauty rating become common, we start to confuse algorithmic opinions with universal truth.

That’s why it’s crucial to approach these tools critically. AI can be a mirror, but it's often a funhouse mirror—distorted by the values and assumptions built into it. Using AI for self-reflection can be empowering, but only when we remember: your worth cannot be reduced to a number.

So next time you’re tempted to ask, “how normal am I?”—maybe ask instead: “who gets to define normal?”